<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lebanon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simonbuckle.com/2006/07/26/lebanon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simonbuckle.com/2006/07/26/lebanon/</link>
	<description>Random thoughts for random people</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Zuk</title>
		<link>http://www.simonbuckle.com/2006/07/26/lebanon/#comment-11851</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Zuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 06:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonbuckle.com/2006/07/26/lebanon/#comment-11851</guid>
		<description>Did Miriam Azar ever spend time in Michigan ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Miriam Azar ever spend time in Michigan ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miriam</title>
		<link>http://www.simonbuckle.com/2006/07/26/lebanon/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator>Miriam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonbuckle.com/2006/07/26/lebanon/#comment-463</guid>
		<description>Hi Simon, 

Thanks for your comments, and I wish the solution was that simple. 

While many in Lebanon criticise Hizbollah, the answer to your question on why the Lebanese and Israeli Governments could not flush out Hizbollah together is complex and due to several reasons: 

1) Support for Hizbollah: the movement has local (notably the Shiite community) and regional (notably Palestinian) support. This is due to its grassroot networks and extensive social welfare programmes to the underrepresented Shiite communities in Lebanon, and its resistance to Israel as the former occupier. It has earned respect from many (cross-sectarian within Lebanon and across the Arab world) for its ability to have forced Israel to retreat out of the occupied Southern part of Lebanon in 2000. 

2) Raison d'etre: Hizbollah is seen as a resistance movement and one which was formed after the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982 to resist the Israeli occupation of the South of Lebanon. Its stated raison d'etre will continue so long as Israel occupies the Lebanese Shebaa Farms and continues to violate Lebanese airspace. 

3) Lebanese Government: is weak and composed of sectarian groups with Hizbollah's political representation (democratically elected). The Government has also been under Syrian control till last year in the aftermath of the Hariri assassination. 

4) Lebanese army: is no match for Hizbollah - &#38; more importantly, the army has a large portion of Shiites (the main sectarian group supporting Hizbollah). It would be dangerous for the Lebanese Government to send its army against Hizbollah, as this could create a disintegration of the army - or worse, send Lebanon into another civil war. 

5) Lebanese society: is a make-up of various sectarian groups and is fragile following the long civil-war - so fighting internal groups would be highly risky for the unity of the country.  

6) Nationalism: no-one would want the former-occupier, Israel (and one seen to still occupy the Lebanese Shebaa farms) to interfere in Lebanese affairs 

7) Regional actors: happy to continue arming the group and to use southern Lebanon as a zone for their own interests. Syria is supporting Hizbollah as a joker card in its own negotiations with Israel for the occupied Golan Heights; Iran found the faction especially useful during the Iraq-Iran war in pressuring the West, and continues to support Hizbollah with arms. 

Hope that answers some of your questions....Happy to further discuss this. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Simon, </p>
<p>Thanks for your comments, and I wish the solution was that simple. </p>
<p>While many in Lebanon criticise Hizbollah, the answer to your question on why the Lebanese and Israeli Governments could not flush out Hizbollah together is complex and due to several reasons: </p>
<p>1) Support for Hizbollah: the movement has local (notably the Shiite community) and regional (notably Palestinian) support. This is due to its grassroot networks and extensive social welfare programmes to the underrepresented Shiite communities in Lebanon, and its resistance to Israel as the former occupier. It has earned respect from many (cross-sectarian within Lebanon and across the Arab world) for its ability to have forced Israel to retreat out of the occupied Southern part of Lebanon in 2000. </p>
<p>2) Raison d&#8217;etre: Hizbollah is seen as a resistance movement and one which was formed after the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982 to resist the Israeli occupation of the South of Lebanon. Its stated raison d&#8217;etre will continue so long as Israel occupies the Lebanese Shebaa Farms and continues to violate Lebanese airspace. </p>
<p>3) Lebanese Government: is weak and composed of sectarian groups with Hizbollah&#8217;s political representation (democratically elected). The Government has also been under Syrian control till last year in the aftermath of the Hariri assassination. </p>
<p>4) Lebanese army: is no match for Hizbollah - &amp; more importantly, the army has a large portion of Shiites (the main sectarian group supporting Hizbollah). It would be dangerous for the Lebanese Government to send its army against Hizbollah, as this could create a disintegration of the army - or worse, send Lebanon into another civil war. </p>
<p>5) Lebanese society: is a make-up of various sectarian groups and is fragile following the long civil-war - so fighting internal groups would be highly risky for the unity of the country.  </p>
<p>6) Nationalism: no-one would want the former-occupier, Israel (and one seen to still occupy the Lebanese Shebaa farms) to interfere in Lebanese affairs </p>
<p>7) Regional actors: happy to continue arming the group and to use southern Lebanon as a zone for their own interests. Syria is supporting Hizbollah as a joker card in its own negotiations with Israel for the occupied Golan Heights; Iran found the faction especially useful during the Iraq-Iran war in pressuring the West, and continues to support Hizbollah with arms. </p>
<p>Hope that answers some of your questions&#8230;.Happy to further discuss this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
